Yesterday I was involved in what’s likely to be be my last face-to-face teaching and meetings from some weeks, possibly months. In the morning my colleague Duncan McCollin and I watched our final year students take part in an assessed debate that pitted two sides against one another to argue whether or not Brexit will have a negative effect on biodiversity. The students did very well, they had a great grasp of the issues and the facts and figures. The end result was very much a draw:
Teaching at the University of Northampton will go online from the end of the week and a field trip for our first year undergraduates that we had planned for this Thursday has been pulled. Our annual Tenerife Field Course has also been cancelled: this will be the first year since 2003 that I have not visited the island and it’s going to leave a hole in my long-term data sets. Perhaps the universe is telling me that it’s time to write them up for publication?
Last week I did a quick vox pop on Twitter to ask how COVID-19 has affected ecology field work at other universities:
The response was interesting and it’s clear that overseas field courses have been massively impacted. Following the UK Government’s advice yesterday about limiting social contact it seems that local field work for student groups will also be affected. Hopefully those undertaking individual field work, especially PhD and postdoctoral researchers, will still be able to carry out their data collection. Do let me know in the comments if it’s affecting your work.
There were also some Twitter responses from professional ecological consultants pointing out that they may not be able to carry out surveys of sites for planning and development purposes. This is yet another way in which COVID-19 is going to impact our economy.
Following the student debate, Duncan and I headed out to catch up with a meeting of the steering group of the Chequered Skipper Reintroduction Project We missed the morning’s presentations but arrived in time for the lunch and a short field trip:
The location of the reintroduction is still being kept secret, as is a second site where a further reintroduction of butterflies from the Belgium population is being considered. However there was much discussion as to whether restrictions on travel means that this would have to be delayed until next year.
On the way to that site, during a 15 minute drive, we spotted seven red kites. They are now so common that seeing these amazing birds hardly requires comment. But we should never forget what an incredibly successful conservation story this has been. To cap it all, when we arrived at the site I had the pleasure of meeting Karl Ivens, one of the main drivers behind the reintroduction of red kites to Northamptonshire. He now estimates the regional population to be a couple of thousand birds. The guy deserves a statue, or at least a blue plaque on his house!
On the way home I was thinking about my next blog post and what to write, and whether or not to bring the pandemic into it. There’s a lot of information, and misinformation, about COVID-19 online and I’m not qualified to add to that: I’m not an epidemiologist. However I’d like to link to a few things I think are worth reading.
Over at the Dynamic Ecology blog, Brian McGill has posted an open thread on ecologists discussing the coronavirus pandemic. There are some interesting contributions in the comments, particularly around the response of the UK Government to the crisis. I was struck by Jeremy Fox’s comment that Britain has some brilliant epidemiological modelers and that “even if you don’t think much of Boris Johnson or his senior advisers, the modelers who are feeding them information and advice are intellectually honest, hardworking, care deeply about protecting the public, and are as good at their jobs as anybody in the world.” As I pointed out in a reply, this is undoubtedly true, but a lot depends on whether the government is willing to implement that advice. And its track record so far is not inspiring: for years it ignored expert advice on the effects of badger culling on the spread of bovine TB and continued to kill badgers. It’s only just reversed that decision. Let’s hope that they have learned from that experience.
I am also hoping that there will be at least one positive outcome from the current pandemic on top of recent extreme weather patterns linked to climate change (for example the drought and fires in Australia that I blogged about in January). I hope that it serves to remind the public, governments and large corporations just how dependent on the environment our society is. Despite our advanced technologies, we are incredibly sensitive to disruptions in the natural world. As this old piece from the New York Times points out: “most epidemics — AIDS, Ebola, West Nile, SARS, Lyme disease and hundreds more that have occurred over the last several decades — don’t just happen. They are a result of things people do to nature“. That was in 2012, long before COVID-19 was discovered. To update this, check out the Wildlife Conservation Society’s ongoing series of articles about the relationship between our destruction of natural habitats, the trade in illegally (and legally) hunted animals, and emerging diseases such as COVID-19.
I realise that I’m fortunate and that there’s a lot that I can do by working from home. For the next few weeks I’ll be doing just that, supporting students online, completing grant and manuscript reviews, having Zoom/Skype meetings, and completing the book that I am writing. Stay safe everyone.