Does GAad exist? UPDATE – turns out that he does!

2013-11-26 18.16.12

UPDATE:  Hypotheses are there to be tested and if you read the comments below you’ll see that my hypothesis “G. Aad does not exist and is a clever, made-up first author by the ATLAS team at CERN” has been falsified.  Such is the way of science, it was a nice idea but we have to move on to new challenges:  over at the Dynamic Ecology blog, Brian McGill is fairly certain that Dr Van in the paper Vincent, Van & Goh (1996) is made up…..


Original post:

Dublin.  Guinness.  Science.  It’s a heady mix and invariably under such circumstances, scientists turn their conversation to the big questions that matter, including the use of surreptitious humour in scientific publications.

In the bar at University College Dublin this evening, where I’m currently external examiner for their BSc Environmental Biology course, a small group of us traded examples that we knew of: barmen and vineyard owners named in the acknowledgements; pet dogs as co-authors; unwitting funders thanked; hidden references to hard drugs; made-up ecology listed in book indices and on Wikipedia; kids thanked for field assistance; camouflaged side swipes at rivals.

There’s a long list, but the biggest question for me, and one which I’ve wanted to write about for a while, is: does G. Aad exist?

A certain G. Aad is listed as the first author on many of the scientific papers being published by the ATLAS group at CERN – for example here:

Indeed, G. Aad is first author on (quite literally) hundreds of papers* from this group:

Clearly the ATLAS team has listed the collaborators on each paper alphabetically, beginning with G. Aad, and with the UK’s most high-profile physicist, B.E. Cox, part-way down.  But whilst Professor Brian Cox certainly exists, G. Aad just seems a little too convenient, akin to Aadvark Electricians in printed phone book listings, when such things mattered.

Too convenient and too……clever:  G. Aad…..GAad…..Gaad…..God…..geddit?

An appropriate first author for publications from the team that has been searching for the God Particle.  But Dr Aad does not appear as a bona fide member of staff on the websites of any of the institutions where he is credited as working and I suspect that he is fictitious.  So unless someone knows different, I’d like to suggest this as one of the best examples of hidden humour in the science literature.


*Web of Knowledge lists 305 papers with G. Aad as first author, giving him an h-index of 34.  All since 2008……

15 thoughts on “Does GAad exist? UPDATE – turns out that he does!

  1. Pingback: Friday links: does Gaad exist, stories behind classic ecology papers, evolution of chess, and more | Dynamic Ecology

      1. jeffollerton Post author

        Oh yes, there are traces of him around, I also found some. But his CERN profile is blank:

        And as far as I can see he is not listed as a member of staff at Freiburg, supposedly his most recent place of employment.

        Perhaps I’m wrong, or perhaps these are planted traces to construct a fictitious history for him to convince journal editors that he exists….?

  2. isoy

    The talk at Freiburg was 2010, but he still is listet at CPPM in Marseille, so i’d guess here is there by now (my link from above again:
    It also shows his mail address, telephone number and even where his office is …I’d say, if that is still not enough, one should just call. And also start wondering, if B.E. Cox really exists, or simply is a dirty joke …?

    1. jeffollerton Post author

      I was going to try the phone number today and then Gordon Watts wrote his comment, which I’ll take as definitive proof! Guess I will have to update my post 🙂

      Can’t possibly comment on Brian Cox, though fairly sure he exists as I’ve seen him on TV…..

  3. gordonwatts

    Ha! Excellent. He does exist. I was at his thesis defense, and I know him well. He is currently at CPPM, in the south of France. I wonder if I could get this to go a little viral?

    1. jeffollerton Post author

      Thanks Gordon, I’ll take this as proof and update my post. Unless of course you don’t really exist and the whole thing is an elaborate ploy….

      1. gordonwatts

        I blog, therefore I exist (though not so much these days!). If you are going to go all conspiracy theory on me, then there really isn’t much I can say, is there? 😉

  4. Pingback: Rational explanations | Jeff Ollerton's Biodiversity Blog

    1. jeffollerton Post author

      That hadn’t occurred to me, Joachim, but you’re correct. I was focused more on the spelling than the sound.

      It’s all immaterial now, of course!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s